Blandy & Blandy Solicitors

Insights // 05 August 2019

Opposing a Lease Renewal on Redevelopment Grounds

Partner Katja Wigham, in our Commercial Property team, explains how a landlord may be able to oppose a lease renewal based on the intention to develop. 

A tenant has a right to a new lease at the end of the contractual term if Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (“the 1954 Act”) applies to the tenancy and the lease has not been contracted out of the security of tenure provisions contained in the 1954 Act.

A protected tenancy can be terminated in various ways. Amongst other methods of termination, it is possible for a landlord to oppose the renewal of a protected tenancy provided the landlord specifies a statutory ground for opposing renewal and does so with good faith. There are seven statutory ground of opposition. This can either be done in a landlord’s Section 25 notice under the 1954 Act or in a counter-notice if the tenant has already served a Section 26 request under the 1954 Act.

If the landlord successfully opposes renewal, the tenant is entitled to compensation based on the rateable value (or in some cases twice the rateable value) of the Premises if the landlord establishes one of the “no fault” grounds. There is no right to compensation in the “fault” grounds.

One of the “no fault” grounds is Section 30(1)(f) of the 1954 Act intention to develop. Demonstrating this intention is not straightforward and there have been a number of cases in this area.

In the case of S Frances Ltd v The Cavendish Hotel (London) [2018] ER (D) 19 (Dec), the Supreme Court held the landlord had to demonstrate, in addition to the subjective and objective elements of intention, that its intention to undertake works was held independently of the tenant’s right to a new tenancy. It was held that a conditional intention to redevelop is not the fixed and settled intention that ground (f) requires.

The S Frances case was considered further in the case of London Kendal Street No3 Ltd v Daejan Investments Ltd  [2019] Lexis Citation 76, and the judgment was dated 16 July 2019. In the latter case it was held that the landlord had the requisite intention under Section 30(1)(f). Although London Kendal Street was only a County Court judgment, it is the first reported case the S Frances case.

The law in this area is complicated, and each case will turn on its own facts. The landlord must be able to demonstrate a genuine intention to redevelop that is independent of the tenant’s statutory right to a new tenancy in order to be successful in opposing renewal under Section 30(1)(f) of the 1954 Act.

For further information or legal advice, please contact law@blandy.co.uk or call 0118 951 6800. 

This article is intended for the use of clients and other interested parties. The information contained in it is believed to be correct at the date of publication, but it is necessarily of a brief and general nature and should not be relied upon as a substitute for specific professional advice.

Katja Wigham

Katja Wigham

Partner, Commercial Property Law

Read Bio

News & Insights

Employment Law and Employees' Misuse of IT and Social Media – An Update for Employers
Laura Binnie

Laura Binnie

Associate Solicitor, Employment Law

Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) Guidance on Sexual Harassment and Harassment at Work
Laura Binnie

Laura Binnie

Associate Solicitor, Employment Law

The South Oxfordshire Local Plan – What is Happening?
Kayleigh Chapman

Kayleigh Chapman

Solicitor, Planning & Environmental Law

IR35 a “Hot Topic” for Employers
David Lamont

David Lamont

Marketing Manager

Advice on Purchasing a Commercial Freehold Property at Auction
Geena-Mae Bucknall

Geena-Mae Bucknall

Solicitor, Commercial Property Law

Changes to the Intestacy Rules Provide a Boost for Spouses
Patrick Brennan

Patrick Brennan

Associate Solicitor, Wills, Probate, Tax & Trusts

Execution of  Documents by Overseas Companies
David Few

David Few

Partner, Corporate & Commercial Law & Notary Public

Seminar - 'Commercial Leases - Protecting Your Interests and Avoiding the Pitfalls'
David Lamont

David Lamont

Marketing Manager

Employment Law Events Spring 2020
David Lamont

David Lamont

Marketing Manager

View More