Blandy & Blandy Solicitors

Making an Appointment and Visiting our Offices >>

Insights // 23 June 2021

Will We See a Rise in Inheritance Tax (IHT) or a New Wealth Tax?

Partner Caroline Casagranda, in our leading Wills, Probate, Tax & Trusts team, looks at what the future may bring in terms of Inheritance Tax and a much discussed new 'wealth tax'.

In this year’s spring budget, Chancellor Rishi Sunak opted to make few tax changes that directly affected individuals and their families, no doubt feeling that practically and politically it was perhaps not the right time to consider anything more.

Mr Sunak did announce that Inheritance Tax (IHT) thresholds, which had been due to rise in line with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) from the next tax year, will instead remain at their current rates until 2026. As the value of estates (and in particular, property) increases, spurred on perhaps by the Stamp Duty ‘holiday’, more beneficiaries may therefore find themselves impacted by IHT in the future.

IHT is currently applied to the portion of a person’s estate above the £325,000 tax free threshold at a flat rate of 40% upon their death, unless a significant proportion passes to charities in which case the rate applied reduces to 36%. IHT also applies to any gifts made by the deceased in the seven years prior to their death and to lifetime gifts other than to individuals, charities and qualifying political parties. Further IHT reliefs and exemptions may apply.

A significant increase in Government borrowing has seen the UK’s debt soar to £2.14 trillion. Even before the pandemic, some had called for tax reforms. In its second report on the subject in July 2019, the Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) had recommended changes including introducing a lower flat rate of IHT and significantly reduced reliefs and exemptions.

The question of a new 'wealth tax'

The Chancellor had previously rejected a proposal from the Wealth Tax Commission in December 2019 to introduce a new “wealth tax” for those with assets over £500,000, describing such a move as "un-Conservative". The subject, much discussed since, has once again featured heavily in the news of late, including in the following articles:

Following a year on year fall in the Government’s income from IHT in 2019-20, which can likely be explained as a result of the increase in the residence nil rate band among other factors, in the past year the Government’s IHT tax take rose to £5.3 billion, just short of a peak of £5.4 billion in 2018-19. Unfortunately, this can largely be attributed to a higher UK death rate – a total of 608,002 deaths were recorded in 2020, compared to 530,841 in 2019 – an increase of 15%. The trend continued into 2021 as a further wave of COVID-19 infections and deaths sadly gripped the country.

Unsurprisingly, IHT was one of the few taxes to generate increased receipts versus the previous year, with VAT, Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) and fuel duty all falling and the Government’s overall tax take down by £49.1 billion (7.8%) year on year.

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), an international intergovernmental economic organisation founded in 1961, has suggested that a larger proportion of the UK Government’s tax income should come from IHT in the future.

Qualifying this comment, the OECD has said: “Inheritance taxation has the potential to play a particularly important role in the current context. Wealth inequality is high and has increased in some countries over recent decades.”

The OECD report highlighted that several studies have shown the top 20% of wealthy households in the UK hold 57% of all wealth, in comparison to an average of 39% across the OECD’s 38 member countries. Incidentally, in the USA that figure is higher, at 67%.

This year’s Sunday Times Rich List found that the number of billionaires in the UK had increased from 147 the previous year to a record 171. The combined wealth of the country’s 250 wealthiest people had risen to £658 billion from £566 billion. Seemingly insulated against the pandemic and economic downturn, wealth in the hands of the wealthy continues to increase, in stark contrast to the rest of the UK population.

Would a Wealth Tax be a fair route?

Traditionally more opposed to so-called wealth taxes, in April the International Monetary Fund (IMF) said: “To help meet pandemic-related financing needs, policymakers could consider a temporary Covid-19 recovery contribution, levied on high incomes or wealth.”

The IMF’s deputy director of fiscal affairs, Paolo Mauro, suggested that: “Governments could consider higher taxes on property, capital gains and inheritance. One specific option would be a COVID-19 recovery contribution – a surcharge on personal tax or corporate income tax.”

John Caudwell, the founder of Phones 4U, who has an estimated net worth of £1.5bn according to The Sunday Times, has called for a one-off ‘Windfall Tax’ on the ‘super rich’ who have largely seen their wealth increase during the past year. Research by The Sunday Times indicated that a one-off tax of 5% on all wealth over £1 billion would generate £19 billion in tax revenue.

In December 2020, research conducted by the Wealth Tax Commission (founded by the London School of Economics and University of Warwick) found that the Government could raise £260 billion by introducing a 5% tax on assets over £500,000. There is of course a huge difference between those people with wealth that exceeds £1 billion and those with assets over £500,000.

Another tax, perceived to be a tax for the more affluent pockets of the population and one that has been the subject of debate, is Capital Gains Tax (CGT), which has also remained under the microscope throughout the past year. A report published by the Institute for Public Policy Research suggested that if CGT bandings were in line with Income Tax bands (at 20%, 40% and 45%) an additional £90 billion of tax revenue would be generated over a period of five years. Partner Caroline Casagranda, in our leading Wills, Probate, Tax & Trusts team,

In its report on 20 May 2021, the Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) called for a series of changes to CGT, which some estimates say would actually reduce the Government’s tax take by around £100 million but make the process far more effective.

The OTS report suggests that the deadline for the payment of CGT by those selling residential property should be extended from 30 to 60 days after the completion of the transaction. It also proposed extending the deadline by which divorcing couples can claim spousal exemption on CGT when dividing their assets, to two years following their separation.

In the spring budget, CGT allowances were frozen at their current level until April 2026, which will benefit many in the shorter term but may mean over time that more people are impacted by CGT in real terms, if the value of any additional properties (to a main home) and other taxable assets increases.

Speaking last month, the Chancellor said that he was “cautiously optimistic” about the UK’s economic recovery and he reiterated his belief that the country already had a “very progressive tax system”.

Mr Sunak was asked if high net worth individuals may yet face tax increases and answered: “The top 1%, for example, of income earners pay or account for almost 30 per cent of all Income Tax receipts as it is. We can get debt on a stable to declining basis broadly with the measures that we’ve already announced.”

In focussing on the so-called ‘super rich’ and discussing Income Tax, the Chancellor arguably circumvented the issue and did not directly rule out future changes to IHT or other reforms. Any potential increases to IHT could potentially affect millions of families across London and the south east of England, and many more nationally.

Questions around longer term tax increases refuse to go away however. Several weeks ago, a number of articles, including iNews’ ‘Sunak ‘Minded’ to Hike Inheritance Tax to Help Pay UK’s COVID Bill’, claimed that the Government is in fact moving towards a rise in IHT.

The newspaper’s City Editor, David Parsley, wrote: “Chancellor Rishi Sunak is “moving towards” a rise in inheritance tax as part of a raft of tax hikes to help pay the near £400bn COVID bill. Treasury sources have revealed that Mr Sunak is “minded” to seek billions from people’s estates via a number of possible routes. One option is said to be an increase in the current rate of inheritance tax of 40% on estates worth more than £325,000 to 41%. The Chancellor is also looking at introducing a 45% rate on assets worth more than £1m.”

The article continued: “While the measure may be temporary, it is expected to last at least three years as part of a package of tax hikes to pay off Government debt accrued during the pandemic. One Treasury official suggested a rise in Inheritance Tax would be a “politically sound move, as it would not disproportionately hit lower income families, and could be presented as a wealth tax”. The source added: “It is something the Chancellor is minded to do and is moving towards, but the timing remains uncertain.

A senior Government advisor said: “The preference is to introduce the tax hikes after winning the next election off the back of a ‘COVID victory bounce’. If that becomes the plan then we can expect the next General Election by the spring of 2023 at the latest, as we’ve got to start paying the bill for the pandemic in the ‘medium term’ as the Chancellor has already given the nation fair warning on.”

It is very much a case of watch this space.

If you would like advice in relation to making or updating your will and estate planning, please get in touch with our specialist Wills, Probate, Tax & Trusts team.

For further information or legal advice, please contact law@blandy.co.uk or call 0118 951 6800. 

This article is intended for the use of clients and other interested parties. The information contained in it is believed to be correct at the date of publication, but it is necessarily of a brief and general nature and should not be relied upon as a substitute for specific professional advice.

Caroline Casagranda

Caroline Casagranda

Partner, Wills, Probate Tax & Trusts

Read Bio

News & Insights

Report on How Police Respond to Violence Against Women and Girls Published
Elizabeth Owen

Elizabeth Owen

Solicitor, Family Law

What is Spousal Maintenance and How is it Calculated?
Rebecca Ledgerwood

Rebecca Ledgerwood

Solicitor, Family Law

Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) - Exemption for Residential Extensions
Kayleigh Chapman

Kayleigh Chapman

Solicitor, Planning & Environmental Law

More Stringent Obligations on the Horizon for Landlords Relating to Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) for Non-Domestic Rented Property
Gemma Smith

Gemma Smith

Associate Solicitor, Commercial Property Law

Conditions Restricting Permitted Development Rights
Kayleigh Chapman

Kayleigh Chapman

Solicitor, Planning & Environmental Law

Financial Settlement On Divorce - What Can I Do to Manage My Legal Fees?
Claire Dyer

Claire Dyer

Partner, Family Law

Why It Is Important to Make or Review Your Will When Moving Home
Dani McGurk

Dani McGurk

Solicitor, Wills, Probate, Tax & Trusts & Court of Protection

Considerations for Charities in England and Wales as COVID-19 Restrictions Are Lifted
Nick Burrows

Nick Burrows

Chairman & Partner, Charity & Commercial Law

Blandy & Blandy Advises on The Cold Chain Federation’s Acquisition of Commercial Transport Publishing
David Lamont

David Lamont

Marketing Manager

View More